Pricing
Pricing, engineered around the customer.
We set a price with the same discipline we bring to an engagement. We measure the footprint a customer has, account for where the business is heading over the term ahead, and build a number that fits both. Much of the security industry prices for its own convenience, and the way it does so changes with each category of service.
How the industry prices
The flaw takes a different shape in each category.
Sold as software, security is still billed mostly by the seat, a model that charges a company for hiring and that the market has begun to leave behind. Per-user pricing fell from 64 percent of SaaS companies in 2024 to 57 percent in 2025 as usage and hybrid models rose, in Monetizely's benchmark. Some vendors meter by the gigabyte, so the bill climbs highest during the incident the tool was bought to handle. And where a price is quoted at all, it is quoted privately. Vendr, which brokers billions in software contracts, finds the same product priced several times apart from one buyer to the next, so a company has nothing to measure its own quote against. Even basic protections that belong in every tier, single sign-on among them, are held back for a costlier one, a practice Consumer Reports has described as charging extra for safety.
Sold as a managed service, security is billed like a utility, with onboarding, log overages, and incident-response retainers surfacing as separate line items after the contract is signed. Gartner cautions that as these providers adopt AI, the savings tend to stay with the vendor. Sold through a partner, the same per-seat model quietly thins the margin of the MSP carrying the client relationship, while the vendor's own direct team competes for that account. Sold to a government buyer, the pressure runs toward the lowest bid, one that federal policy itself now restrains for cybersecurity work under DFARS 215.101-2-70. The common thread is a number shaped around the seller and its quarter.
Vendr, which brokers billions in software contracts, finds the same product priced several times apart across buyers. With no published price, the figure comes down to the seller's read of the budget.
How we price
We plan the number around your business.
Rampart Cybersecurity LLC scopes a price the way it scopes the work, and holds it to the same standard of evidence.
The number follows the size of what we are protecting, so it scales with a customer's real footprint and with the growth they can already see coming, and adding staff never moves it. It is disclosed in full before anyone signs, with every variable that can change it named. The figure holds, with no second bill for the parts left off the first and no escalator built quietly into the term. Verskop reports only what it can prove and holds back the rest, and our pricing follows the same rule. Each way of working with us carries its own catalog, and that is where the model is laid out, with the figure or the basis behind it shown next to the scope it covers.
The sources on this page
The pricing-model and dispersion figures are from Monetizely and Vendr, the paywalled-feature finding from Consumer Reports, the managed-service economics from Gartner, and the LPTA restriction from the DFARS. The only claim that is ours is how Rampart Cybersecurity LLC and Verskop price.
See the catalogs
See how each model is priced.
Choose how you want to work with us. Each catalog shows how that tier is priced and what shapes the number, next to the scope it covers.